MAdBull M203 + KWA M4....?

So, as some of you know I ordered a bottom rail for my KWA M4 in my last ASGI order. I want to know if this will look good/work well on my M4's standard front grip? I want one with an actual trigger as opposed to a button, but these look the best IMHO and couldn't find one with a trigger....
http://www.airsoftgi.com/product_info.php?cPath=139_128&products_id=1212

I like the looks of the bigger one, but since It's going on an M4, do you think this one will be too long and that I should get the shorter version? Any other suggestions are of course welcome.

DO IT, JUST DO IT!!

Hm...If I find that on AEX or ASGI I may buy, but I like the sleek look of the other...this is full metal frame and tube, I like the sound of that, but I don't want it to add TOO much weight to the front of my replica.

M14 double-taps wrote:

Hm...If I find that on AEX or ASGI I may buy, but I like the sleek look of the other...this is full metal frame and tube, I like the sound of that, but I don't want it to add TOO much weight to the front of my replica.

what sort of stock do you have?

A regular crane stock; It's a KWA M4A1.

oh, because i was going to suggest you put some weights in it if it was a full.

Also, my gun is very front heavy as it is with my Titanium silencer on the front.

but... what?! titanium silencers should be light!!! what blasphemy!

it adds about a pound
It actually balances the weapon I should say, I like that little extra weight in the front, but combined with an M203 it could be deadly
Not sure why I'm making this statement though because I am positive I'm gettin a launcher, I've already got the rail!

simple. remove the silencer (put your sick new flash hider on there instead) and put the m203 there. then it will be frontheavy, but not as much. With grenade launchers, it is almost impossible to avoid unbalance.

Good thinking....and I realize it'll be a tad front heavy, but I wasn't going to let it stop me!!
So, In general, for an M4 do you guys think I should get a longer or shorter launcher?

In my opinion, the long launcher gives it a cool look (sort of a "tame machine dominated by a powerful beast" feel) The short launcher makes the whole rig look like a mini m16, and that just isn't manly .

aveenvp wrote:

The short launcher makes the whole rig look like a mini m16, and that just isn't manly .

yes, much like this.



(what an insult to Mikhail Kalashnikov. he must be crying right now.)

or this.

Actually, It would take some serious balls to field that AK. And that tank would probably be taken out by air support within minutes of the mission commencing (visible for miles around).

aveenvp wrote:

Actually, It would take some serious balls to field that AK. And that tank would probably be taken out by air support within minutes of the mission commencing (visible for miles around).

while i do agree with you that, yes, it would take some cajones to bring that Type 56 onto the field, it is also a slap in the face to Mikhail Kalashnikov which my warped redneck logic tells me is unmanly. and you would have to be insane to bring an orange Lepard 2 into the area of operations. it was a joke, man.

get the long one. i had a real steel m4a1 w/ m203 in the army. it was bad ass and so will your kwa be with the long one. its more realistic..

dude jarhead don't make fun on my AK! but yea m14, I personally would go with the longer version but is it a R.I.S or a barrel mounted?