| | Theoretically.... |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
br55ftw
Captain
Posts : 433
Join date : 2009-04-04
Age : 30
Location : Clinton, NY
|  Subject: Theoretically....  Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:52 pm | |
| If I were to (theoretically) buy a G36C/K, what is the best one for under $250 +/- $25? My research  has yielded few results besides KWA, SRC/TSD, ARES, and Echo 1. Kind of want to avoid Echo 1 though.... | |
|
| | |
iliveforthis99
Colonel
Posts : 1492
Join date : 2009-04-18
Age : 35
Location : Virginia
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:09 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Creed769
Colonel
Posts : 1009
Join date : 2008-12-30
Age : 30
Location : Southern California
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:14 pm | |
| Yes, KWA hands down, but Echo 1 G36k's are simply amazing.
May I ask why you are avoiding Echo 1?
They are a great company, not as good as KWA, but I can still compete with my Echo 1 G36k up against a KWA m4!
Who cares if your rate of fire is so good it can kill someone? There's no point in using it fully unless you spray alot. | |
|
| | |
alexkmmll
Major
Posts : 826
Join date : 2009-11-01
Age : 27
Location : Madison, WI
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:22 pm | |
| Yeah, KWAs guns seem to be a bit underpowered for the price, and Echo 1s have great gearboxes. I have one my self and I apsolutely love it, great construction too. Its very accurate, and it hurts, a lot! | |
|
| | |
mgunner564
Colonel
Posts : 1303
Join date : 2009-02-03
Age : 113
Location : Maine
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:24 pm | |
| well if yoi buy an Echo1 you can also buy optics, mags and all those other doo-dads, internal or external. | |
|
| | |
sticks.13
Moderator
Posts : 1931
Join date : 2008-02-10
Age : 32
Location : C-BUS, Ohio
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:53 pm | |
|
Last edited by sticks.13 on Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:03 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
iliveforthis99
Colonel
Posts : 1492
Join date : 2009-04-18
Age : 35
Location : Virginia
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:55 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
sticks.13
Moderator
Posts : 1931
Join date : 2008-02-10
Age : 32
Location : C-BUS, Ohio
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:02 pm | |
| Yep, and thats what I get for reading everything through...  fix'd my post. sticks | |
|
| | |
br55ftw
Captain
Posts : 433
Join date : 2009-04-04
Age : 30
Location : Clinton, NY
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:41 pm | |
| Well I don't mind a full size, but I kind of like the K. I've heard bad things about CA guns though, but I'm not sure...
Thinking Echo 1, CA, or KWA. Echo 1's K, CA's K, or KWA's C most likely. | |
|
| | |
sticks.13
Moderator
Posts : 1931
Join date : 2008-02-10
Age : 32
Location : C-BUS, Ohio
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:02 am | |
| I don't understand where all of these bad reports of CA's are coming from. CA had a bad M4 run 2 years ago. The wiring contacts, and hop-up was not the best. But they still lasted and out shot echo 1's AND KWA's(when they first came out)....
Now both CA and KWA have stepped up their game, they perform about the same. If you look at the price of the guns you will notice the KWA's can run higher, and they have a KWA unique hop-up. So you have to buy the 2G bucking and some TBB's wont fit. Thats why I recommended a Classic Army G36.
sticks | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Theoretically.... | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Theoretically.... | |
|
