| KWA or G&G? | |
|
+4SnoSnipe M14 double-taps iliveforthis99 jordan062187 8 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
jordan062187 Private
Posts : 10 Join date : 2010-05-01
| Subject: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 11:41 am | |
| | |
|
| |
iliveforthis99 Colonel
Posts : 1492 Join date : 2009-04-18 Age : 35 Location : Virginia
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 12:19 pm | |
| Performance in range and accuracy should be similar although the KWA i believe will shoot a little harder in the 400-420 FPS range.
I'd go with the KWA though, G&G makes great stuff but KWA is just amazing at what they do to make their guns so nice. | |
|
| |
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 1:16 pm | |
| I've handeled that KWA M16 many a time, It's the most solid, rugged Replica I've ever seen. It's also very accurate and a hard hitter. | |
|
| |
SnoSnipe Colonel
Posts : 1961 Join date : 2010-01-01 Age : 30 Location : Washington, USA
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 3:06 pm | |
| KWA. My G&G seems better than my friend's KWA, but mine's selector switch fell off, so go with KWA | |
|
| |
Warsawwarrior9 Major
Posts : 592 Join date : 2009-04-21 Age : 33 Location : Coudersport North Central Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 5:20 pm | |
| It's all about the selector switch.. | |
|
| |
SnoSnipe Colonel
Posts : 1961 Join date : 2010-01-01 Age : 30 Location : Washington, USA
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 5:54 pm | |
| - Warsawwarrior9 wrote:
- It's all about the selector switch..
It's the little things that count. Haha | |
|
| |
Jarhead999 76 65 General Grade 2
Posts : 4940 Join date : 2009-04-29 Age : 92 Location : Rio Rancho/NW Albuquerque, New Mexico, Socialist States of Obama
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 6:01 pm | |
| I vote KWA, mainly because they are just so. "Watch your language". good. | |
|
| |
Warsawwarrior9 Major
Posts : 592 Join date : 2009-04-21 Age : 33 Location : Coudersport North Central Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 7:30 pm | |
| for the tracers, usually your bb doesn't fly for more than what? 3 seconds? no need for them to keep glowing afterwords. | |
|
| |
Omega Lambda Major
Posts : 844 Join date : 2009-06-15 Age : 32 Location : Seattle/Whidbey Island, WA
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 7:38 pm | |
| If you're planning to go to any organized games in the future, there will probably be an FPS limit of 400 with .2g BBs. You wouldn't be able to take your KWA M16. I hear the KWA M4 shoots right at 400, and a different version shoots right at 350 (which is a normal CQB limit). Personally, I love my G&G since upgrading the barrel, hopup, and bucking. It really depends on what kind of limits there are on the performance you want, but I'd actually recommend a KWA M4 for you. If you really want the longer barrel, IMO G&G makes a very nice replica under 400fps. You'd be keeping your play options open by not exceeding 400fps and your accessory options open with the RIS. Those are both nice replicas. One thing I can tell you about the G&G though is that it doesn't like MAG plastic midcaps very much. They need 2-4 layers of electrical tape on the back of the mag inside the magwell in order to feed. | |
|
| |
sniper_32 Colonel
Posts : 1529 Join date : 2009-01-18 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? Sun May 23, 2010 8:52 pm | |
| KWA their new gearbox is amazing | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: KWA or G&G? | |
| |
|
| |
| KWA or G&G? | |
|