| Tight Bore Truth | |
|
+5Omega Lambda sniper_32 SnoSnipe Warsawwarrior9 lonesniper24 9 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
lonesniper24 Colonel
Posts : 1714 Join date : 2008-10-23 Age : 29 Location : Cheyenne, Wyoming
| Subject: Tight Bore Truth Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:36 pm | |
| Okay so I was skimming ASF and ran across a thread and one of the members was saying a 6.03mm to 6.05mm was better for people shooting over 150ft, and 6.01mm was better for anything under 150ft I am not sure I have never heard that myself.
I kind of think it is true in ways because if the BB's bouncing less it can come out at a higher distance if the hop up is up. But like I said I am not sure maybe he doesn't know diddly squat about it.
From what he was saying though he has 6.01mm TBB's in most of his replicas and was 6/10 people at 200ft, but the 6.03 was hitting 8/10 at 200ft. There was nobody else that could vouch for him though or that posted vouching for him so I want to bring it here where it's in more of a calm environment and I won't get shot outta the water.
Please only post if you know for a fact though I don't want assumptions going through here and confusing me and other members.
If somebody has both a .01 and .03 could you maybe test it out for us all barrel switching isn't hard but it would be up to you. | |
|
| |
Warsawwarrior9 Major
Posts : 592 Join date : 2009-04-21 Age : 33 Location : Coudersport North Central Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:51 pm | |
| I have shot a 6.03 and a 6.01, only difference in the barrels other than that was that the length of the 6.01 was 550mm and the 6.03 was 363mm. But I can assure you, I found a much better grouping with the 6.01 at 185 than my 6.03, the 6.03 would miss the target I was shooting at around 5/10 times. While the 6.01 was hitting 8-9 out of 10 pending on wind. With the 6.01, I knew I could hit the target with a single shot, 6.03, I would want to put it on full auto to make sure. It is a big difference. | |
|
| |
SnoSnipe Colonel
Posts : 1961 Join date : 2010-01-01 Age : 30 Location : Washington, USA
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:54 am | |
| The tighter it is, the more accurate it is. That is from my, and MAN- MANY friends/teammate's experiences. | |
|
| |
sniper_32 Colonel
Posts : 1529 Join date : 2009-01-18 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:09 pm | |
| 6.01 all the way gotta have it for DMR's, or field guns in my opinion. 6.03 is best for CQB guns | |
|
| |
Omega Lambda Major
Posts : 844 Join date : 2009-06-15 Age : 32 Location : Seattle/Whidbey Island, WA
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:55 pm | |
| I can see one huge problem with the test this guy did. SAMPLE SIZE! Out of 10 shots, you're going to be testing shooter error rather than barrel accuracy. I can't be sure of how well this guy set up his test, but another thing to take into account is CONSTANTS. Ideally, for this test, it would be done in an indoor shooting range with the same gun and the same type of hopup and bucking, if not the same hopup and bucking. Were I to do this test (which I may eventually do just to clear things up) I would do 100 shots with each barrel. The difference between 6/10 and 8/10 is negligible to the point of being useless. If it turned out to be 60/100 and 80/100, that would be far more convincing.
Another thing to take into account is arcing. Is this guy really making point-of-aim = point-of-impact shots at 150 feet? Or is he lobbing them at his target? If he's lobbing them, then his BBs will be guided more by air currents than they would if he made straight shots.
Always stay focused on the scientific process if you want to make a test like this valid. | |
|
| |
AFU Moderator
Posts : 423 Join date : 2008-10-27 Age : 35 Location : Lake Arrowhead
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:46 pm | |
| @Omega Lambda Also consider getting a rifle stand for this test. If you can eliminate the actual need to re-aim the rifle in question, that should give getter results, as each shot in theory should be the exact same.
~AFU | |
|
| |
DrummerBoyz95 General Grade 2
Posts : 3897 Join date : 2009-05-13 Age : 28 Location : Ventura County, CA
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:57 pm | |
| Big 5 has rifle clamps for like $30 | |
|
| |
Omega Lambda Major
Posts : 844 Join date : 2009-06-15 Age : 32 Location : Seattle/Whidbey Island, WA
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:27 pm | |
| Thanks, I'll be sure and pick up something to steady my replica if I do end up doing this test. | |
|
| |
sticks.13 Moderator
Posts : 1931 Join date : 2008-02-10 Age : 32 Location : C-BUS, Ohio
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:05 am | |
| If you believe in the theory of bb bounce(which I do), then STBB such as 6.00, 6.01 and 6.02 barrels are really only useful in smaller barreled rifles. This is due to the fact that the bb bounce is reduced marginally by the tighter spaces. In rifles greater than an M4 length 6.01 barrels actually hurt the accuracy more than they help; compared to after market large bore barrels at least. This is due to the greater friction known as barrel scrub, which basically means the BB is "rubbing" the barrel to much, so it just reduced the affect of the hop-up. PDI actually markets its 6.08 barrel as the most accurate in the series! TM could have made all of their guns come with 6.01 barrels, but they chose a 6.08... I wonder why... Here is a whole article on the effects of barrel scrub and long length STBB's.(ehh can't find it, i'll keep looking though). Found it: http://forums.airsoftmechanics.com/index.php?topic=842.0 Shows theres a heck of allot more to better accuracy than just a TBB. There should be some good tips in there for you guys(teflon, barrel polish etc). sticks | |
|
| |
lonesniper24 Colonel
Posts : 1714 Join date : 2008-10-23 Age : 29 Location : Cheyenne, Wyoming
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:46 pm | |
| Okay so I have been PMing snipers all over ASF I know I know but there aren't many here that have fully upgraded rifles. And many of them are saying they have 6.03mm in there replicas because it seems to do a lot better then the 6.01mm.
And what sicks posted is pretty much what all them are saying, 6.03mm and up seem to be better for longer rifles.
| |
|
| |
sticks.13 Moderator
Posts : 1931 Join date : 2008-02-10 Age : 32 Location : C-BUS, Ohio
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:48 pm | |
| Keep in mind that you guys can GREATLY increase your accuracy by reducing the vibrations in the barrel. If you have a BAR or similar sniper rifle you can fill the space between the inner and outer barrel with cotton balls or something similar. This will do more than you can imagine. Another thing to look into is polishing your barrel, I made a guide awhile back. I still do this with all my rifles and all my barrels.... It doesn't matter if its a 6.03 or a stock 6.08....
sticks
| |
|
| |
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:11 pm | |
| - sticks.13 wrote:
- Keep in mind that you guys can GREATLY increase your accuracy by reducing the vibrations in the barrel. If you have a BAR or similar sniper rifle you can fill the space between the inner and outer barrel with cotton balls or something similar.
sticks
I just aquired a BAR 10 in a trade....how would I do this?? | |
|
| |
sticks.13 Moderator
Posts : 1931 Join date : 2008-02-10 Age : 32 Location : C-BUS, Ohio
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:06 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
lonesniper24 Colonel
Posts : 1714 Join date : 2008-10-23 Age : 29 Location : Cheyenne, Wyoming
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:30 pm | |
| BTW M14 the bar has a 6.04mm barrel stock, if that helps anybody. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Tight Bore Truth | |
| |
|
| |
| Tight Bore Truth | |
|