| M4 Vs. M4 | |
|
+4DrummerBoyz95 Warsawwarrior9 Preacher M14 double-taps 8 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:18 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Preacher Private
Posts : 61 Join date : 2010-08-16 Location : California
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:28 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:31 pm | |
| Any facts to back that....?? I mean i love KWA to death ive owned four, but the CA is cheaper and i feel like this time maybe i should try 'em out....
Im not sure. | |
|
| |
Preacher Private
Posts : 61 Join date : 2010-08-16 Location : California
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:43 pm | |
| The KWA is $5 cheaper.
I've heard CA is getting better, but I would still go with KWA just to be on the safe side.
Or maybe try out a G&P. | |
|
| |
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:49 pm | |
| I'll be Darned, I coulda sworn I read that differently. Yeah, I know CA was in a huge slump but I heard they were getting better, and though I might want a taste fo their new stuff...but I've never gone wrong with KWA so I'm stuck.
This is strictly if I choose to get an M4 again, I'm still loving the TM Sig552 | |
|
| |
Warsawwarrior9 Major
Posts : 592 Join date : 2009-04-21 Age : 33 Location : Coudersport North Central Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:00 pm | |
| I would personally go with the KWA, their 2GX gearboxes are incredible, also, they are lipo ready. | |
|
| |
DrummerBoyz95 General Grade 2
Posts : 3897 Join date : 2009-05-13 Age : 28 Location : Ventura County, CA
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:25 pm | |
| CA requires more maintenance and will clunk out faster than a KWA. G&P or KWA would be my options | |
|
| |
gentry Major
Posts : 722 Join date : 2010-07-12 Location : virginia
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 10:20 pm | |
| CA friend a buddy of mine has had a CA m4 for 4 years all stock still works perfectly and another friend got a KWA and it broke the piston head and a ball bearing the first day | |
|
| |
NoNeed2Hate General
Posts : 2005 Join date : 2009-05-21
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:20 pm | |
| KWA has top notch service though, so in the even that it does break, you are good to go~ (very unlikely... sorry gentry, i think you friend just got the bad on out of the batch.)
| |
|
| |
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:08 am | |
| I agree with most of you. Im pretty dead set on the KWA "DevGru" i think its called. Its a little RIS M4...which i will immediately upgrade the crap out of :p | |
|
| |
Sanguinary Angel Sergeant
Posts : 223 Join date : 2010-05-01 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:25 am | |
| | |
|
| |
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:50 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
SnoSnipe Colonel
Posts : 1961 Join date : 2010-01-01 Age : 30 Location : Washington, USA
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:10 am | |
| If you get a KWA, everything WILL preform great, but WILL break. CA's new guns are great, and very realistic. I would personally get the CA if it was my money. But I bought the G&P M4 from ASGI, put an ICH high torque motor in it, and left it stock. It is the best gun I have ever owned by a long shot. For $250 (not including discount codes and the free shipping), it is great. | |
|
| |
M14 double-taps Moderator
Posts : 2106 Join date : 2008-07-13 Age : 30 Location : St. Louis, MO
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:16 am | |
| Really, thanks for the input ill look into that! However, in my last KWA i put in a 12V battery amd let it stock and that thing ripped for the longest time....i left it mostly stock amd saw no issues. | |
|
| |
Sanguinary Angel Sergeant
Posts : 223 Join date : 2010-05-01 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:36 am | |
| The new ones seem to be set for the 12V lipo. im just using a 9.6 but its still AWESOME!!! I got it all ready for a night operation coming up | |
|
| |
SnoSnipe Colonel
Posts : 1961 Join date : 2010-01-01 Age : 30 Location : Washington, USA
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:10 am | |
| I HATE LIPOS. I run a 9.6 through my G&P, and it is pretty amazing. High torque motor by ICS gives it a really nice trigger response, too. That's the only upgrades I have in it. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: M4 Vs. M4 | |
| |
|
| |
| M4 Vs. M4 | |
|