Dispute

This is my first poll, and I'm trying to settle an argument with a friend. He has a Maruzen type 96, and I have an AGM MP001. In no way is this a bragging contest over guns, mainly because he has me beat
I was thinking though, would it be better to have a good gun and be a complete noob tactics-wise, or to be fantastic when it comes to tactics and have a low grade gun? It seems the obvious answer would be better tactics, but when you think about it, who needs camoflauge when you can simply outrange your opponent? Looking forward to some good discussion

I would rather have a smart player(say 10yr army vet) with a walmart shotgun, than a complete noob with a systema PTW.

If that player can adapt to the situation then he can make the kid with the PTW look super stupid, easily.

sticks

I chose Smart sniper with a bad gun because when you think about it, the smarter you are the higher chance you have of winning. Having a good gun helps also but being smarter is better because the noob would not know how to use his gun.

I have said it once and will say it once again , the gun does not make up the sniper it just helps . The skill and stamina of a sniper combined with the rifle makes up a good sniper .

"it doesn't matter as much as the rifle but the sniper behind the rifle"
that's what my uncle told me before he went on a spotting mission before he got shot.

but it's true I think it doesn't matter about the gun you have but how well you think.

i look at it this way if a noob has a really good gun then who says he will be good with it on the other hand if you have a really good player with a gun that is cheaper then he will adapt to the gun and use i to his advantige such as weight and range.

brains over brauwn

The worlds greatest weapon is a Marine and his rifle, make that a marine sniper and he is a master piece.

In vietnam, a lot of snipers, including carlos hathcock used the remington 700 rifle. It was technically a hunting rifle, not a military sniper rifle. Yet he still managed some quite impressive skills.

In other words. You could have the best equipment in the world, but if you don't know how to use them, they are useless.

look at me I have a very low grade gun but Im still a very feared and respected sniper where I live im probaly not on this forum but here in eastern PA im know as the sniper who has skills but a bad gun. Also I know guy whos momy and dady buy him 5 sniper rifles 1 a maruzen but he has no idea how to use them. The guy is 17.

I'd rather go with the future marine kid (one mind, any weapon) than the complete n00b with a systema

i think that it is all skill not the gun...but the gun surely helps. it is all about knowing tactics and such.........................

I think it's a clear point that it doesn't matter about the rifle grade as long as you use your brain you can do anything and still come out the victor.

I think that this has been a unanimous descision .

The only underage player on our Team uses a Umarex MP5 0,5J,

By paying attention during Trainings, developing his skills during Fun Games/Speed Games, and by staying Mission Focused, on many occasions he has out gunned, out matched and out Played adults on the Field with High End Weapons, and every time he does it, He just keeps getting better !!!!

ya this sint a good poll lol it will be unanimous no matter who looks at it lol. no offense AGM SNIPER

I kind of figured that and that was really what i was going for. Like i said, my friend see's it the other way, the better the gun the better the player, and now i have some hardcore evidence to back my view up

The hardcore evidence:
Smart Sniper with cheap gun- 14
Noobish sniper with excellent gun- 0

Seems pretty clear to me. What about you all?

Well if he is the way you say he is he'll argue with you even after ths so .

Sadly A_S you're probably right. I haven't talked to him lately though so I'm not sure how he'll react